Help on string and cable materials
Posted 21 February 2007 - 03:49 PM
What one of these materials is better for today's compound bows? Is 452X better for tuning with a Mathews than 8125? Or does it matter that much when it comes to bowhunting. Or is one material superior to the other for stretch and long life ?
Would one material be better for dual cam bows than single cam bows?
I know some of you guys know a great deal about this topic than I do about this so what say you.
Posted 21 February 2007 - 04:02 PM
so I'm waiting to see the replies here as well. :)
always a great place for getting educated :)
Live what you believe
Believe what you live
Posted 21 February 2007 - 04:17 PM
I'm sure there's a great explanation to this. :P
Posted 21 February 2007 - 05:52 PM
Shel tends to build from 8125 by default as does Winner's Choice. (One must request 452X to get it.) 8125 tends to look better longer plus it's faster. However, it is less stable (ie. stretches more) than 452X. Now, the theory behind "premium" string companies is that they pre-stretch their materials & strings. So, in theory, you can have the benefits of 8125 without the negatives, or at least as much of a negative.
Personally, I have pretty much sold out to 452X. Even though it is a re-blend of the original 452 material which does not prematurely "fuzz" as rapidly, it still ends up looking shabby sooner than 8125. However, if I want a rock solid string (which I do!) I just haven't found anything as stable to date. Companies like Mathews are shipping 452X strings and cables on their bows, stock. If you have noticed, the common complaint now with Zebra (Mathews string company) over the past 3 years since this became reality has shifted to serving issues. Issues of stretch and/or creep have virtually dropped off the radar!
PA IHEA & NBEF/IBEP Instructor
Posted 22 February 2007 - 09:14 PM
Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:49 AM
From what I've heard the TS1 + fuzzes less than the original TS1.
Posted 23 February 2007 - 01:01 PM
TS1+ is made of what material? And what is the difference between the three string materials? :worry:
Fuzzing? When it starts up is that an indicator to replace the set?
In my limited experience my peep kept turning and the bow reduced poundage on me so the bow shop explained that the strands inside cable or string held by the serving had split and was time to replace it. Made some sense to me but I haven't seen fuzzing but one other time but it was someone elses bow and string looked like it had been cut or scaped badly.
Posted 23 February 2007 - 04:06 PM
The original TS1 material was a Dynema/Vectran blend just like BCY452x and BCY450+. The direct competitor Brownell offers to compete with BCY452x is their new XCEL material.
Vectran blends stretch less but fuzz more. Pure Dynema strings have much higher abrasion resistance. In short they last longer if you can make it thru the stretch period.
Posted 23 February 2007 - 04:26 PM
Posted 08 March 2007 - 12:30 AM
It's not a passion, it's an obsession. ~Mossy Oak
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users